The Weak Case for Proof of Identity on Ham VOIP
           by G.Mike Raymond - K5HUM

ARGUMENT for Identification of Hams

Services like CQ100,eQSO and EchoLink can connect to 
repeaters and Link Stations that are capable of 
directly or remotely transmitting RF energy on Ham 
Radio frequencies, frequencies that are limited only to 
licensed Ham operators. Identifying and attempting to 
restrict these services to the use of Hams only will 
especially eliminate CB'ers and Lids from invading the 
spectrum and services. 


THE ACTUAL FACTS:

Existing FCC Rules provide extensive penalties
for violation of any rules and regulations.

Ham Radio has traditionally been a self monitored
and self policed hobby which has worked for 90+
years. Why is it no longer enough?

Any non Ham can purchase used or NEW Ham equipment
and transmit directly.

GMRS (especially the FREE FAMILY RADIO SERVICE - FRS) 
has existed for years now with ZERO enforcement 
problems for the FCC in light of the millions of units 
sold. 

Frequently (and in most all known cases) it is licensed 
Hams who violate the existing rules. Licensing and 
identification does nothing to stop bad intentions.
 
Additionally, the technology exist to track, locate, 
isolate and capture any and all violators transmitting 
radio energy illegally.  Finally your IP or Internet 
address when online is recorded by your ISP and
becomes a matter of record. 

The European eQSO voip Ham service has existed for 
years with an OPEN policy with zero troubles.  They 
simply state that only licensed Hams can use the 
repeater rooms. They have experienced a zero flood of 
non Hams gumming up the service.


SIDEBAR

At least EchoLink has made the requirement of 
Identification reasonably by allowing you to phone a 
special number from your home telephone. This assumes 
you have Caller ID activated. Personally, I still do 
not agree with this ID Big Brother'ism. It's a 
nuisance, reeks of elitism, and is a further erosion of 
your right to privacy.


                    -[QRT]-